Can this article on The Register be true?  Has Microsoft removed Storage Spaces Direct from the latest Windows Server build?

Where to obtain Windows Server, version 1709To be honest I’d initially not given this article much thought until I decided to have a look at the latest Windows Server build myself.  I was interested to find that I can’t actually download an evaluation copy unless I’m an existing customer (VLSC or Visual Studio subscription).  The only alternative is to pay to run Windows Server in Azure or AWS.  Corporations may not care about this because they will always have access, but where does that leave the individual who wants to learn about Windows?  If this is the trend Microsoft is taking, then we can expect more defections like those in the comments of the article I just shared.

Storage Spaces Direct

What about Storage Spaces?  The Register article comments also question whether Microsoft is looking to make this a paid feature.  I guess it is possible, however again, why completely remove it?  The idea of having to pay first for the O/S and then for features seems to be taking customers for granted.  Maybe there are issues with the use of Storage Spaces and the Core version of Windows – 1709 is being released as a CLI (non-GUI version).

The Architect’s View

I get the feeling that Microsoft doesn’t care about onsite Windows deployments any more.  They’d much rather push customers to Azure or if necessary Azure Stack.  The only sticky products for most customers appear to be Exchange (you can go Office 365) or SQL Server (now almost there on Linux).  What’s left to keep people on Windows, other than Active Directory for file shares?  I personally see fewer and fewer reasons to run Windows Server.  I also only run Windows Desktop for an ageing version of Quickbooks, which if I spent time, I could move to a SaaS service.

Am I missing something with the Microsoft strategy?  It’s a genuine question because I really don’t see any strategy in the direction Windows Server is taking.

Update: Vinícius Apolinário from Microsoft confirmed on Twitter that Storage Spaces Direct (S2D) will return in the next Windows release after 1709 (cold comfort for those using it now).  Also that release 1709 and the semi-annual builds are only available to paying customers or through public cloud.  Time limited previews (not releases) continue to be available through the Windows Insider Program.

Related Links

Comments are always welcome; please read our Comments Policy.  If you have any related links of interest, please feel free to add them as a comment for consideration.  

Copyright (c) 2009-2017 – Post #3B6E – Chris M Evans, first published on, do not reproduce without permission.

We share because we care!Share on Facebook3Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn23Buffer this pageEmail this to someoneShare on Reddit10Share on StumbleUpon0

Written by Chris Evans

  • Romain Serre

    Or maybe S2D and Storage Replica were to buggy to implement them in release 1709. I prefer to wait for 1803 and get a stable S2D release.

  • Elden

    Please see the following link for clarity on Storage Spaces Direct in Windows Server version 1709:

  • Chris,
    How is charging for Storage Spaces Direct different than charging for VSAN? Sure. VMware charged for VSAN from day one and MS would be charging for something that used to be free but other than that it seems about the same to me.

    • Howard, I see what you mean. However, I’m not sure MSFT has ever charged for add-on features in this manner – I could be wrong. I’d be disappointed if this was the direction headed as it sets a precedent. But what surprises me more is the idea of taking a feature out (apparently due to quality issues – Was S2D that bad before?

      • Elden

        Elden Christensen here, I am with the Storage Spaces Direct development team and I can assure you that Storage Spaces Direct is included as a feature in the Windows Server Datacenter edition SKU today, and there is no plan to change that. See the release notes at the following link where I have tried to bring additional clarity on Storage Spaces Direct in Windows Server version 1709